Nanotubes in Damascus swords?

In a report to nature Sharpest cut from nanotube sword (now available here) researchers at Dresden University reported that carbon nano-tubes had been found in a Damascus sword.

Link to TEM micrographs from Nature publication.

So What?
It does seem possible that nanotubes could be contained in these steels, due to the high carbon content in the steel, and the low temperatures that were used during manufacture (I believe once made the Wootz steel is heated and forged repeatedly rather than remelted?). The heating techniques used could have introduced carbon in the form on nanotubes and there isn’t much reason for them to dissolve. I’m told that nanotubes could be produced from the burning of charcoal, leaves etc – they can form from hydrocarbons. With the high carbon content, it seems unlikely that any graphite (or nanotubes?) present would be dissolved into the matrix material.

What does seem very unlikely is that the presence of nanotubes in anyway helps the manufacture or the mechanical properties of the swords.

Making a Damascus Sword

It was unclear how medieval blacksmiths would have overcome the inherent brittleness of the plates of cementite (Fe3C, a mineral known as cohenite) that form in steel with a carbon content of 1–2 wt%, as well as how the steel’s characteristic banding could have arisen from these plates.”

It seems fairly clear that the banding results from repeated mechanical deformation, and segregation of cementite. Cementite is only really brittle at low temperatures, it has recently been shown that having cementite present in steels of 1.5 wt% can be used to enable super plastic forming.

Sherby showed in 1995 that Wootz steel could exhibit superplastic deformation. Wadsworth and Sherby had eariler worked on superplastic forming of high carbon steels with additions of Chromium to stabilise cementite. In these steels cementite helped to keep a small ferrite grain size during hot working. J. Wadsworth and O. D. Sherby, Influence of chromium on superplasticity in ultra-high carbon steels, JOM, Volume 13, Number 12 / December, 1978.

Thermal cycling and cyclic forging cause catalytic elements to segregate gradually into planar arrays parallel to the forging plane11. These elements may give rise to the growth of carbon nanotubes, which in turn initiate formation of cementite nanowires and coarse cementite particles. As the nanoscale structure of Damascus steel emerges, a refined interpretation of its remarkable mechanical properties should become possible.

There are many claims that Damascus swords exhibited superior mechanical properties, but it seems likely that the comparisons that Hadfield had in 1912 have been surpassed in the last 90 years [Hadfield 1912]. It seems difficult to find any reported results of the mechanical properties of these swords. Strength values are available for the modern pattern welded swords but not for the original Damascus swords.

There is available online a JOM article on the role of impurities in Damascus swords. Differences in microstructure along the sword shows a transition from pearlite to a divorced microstructure of ferrite and cementite. The tip would be a very hard pearlite with Rockwell C hardness around 32.

Rockwell C hardness data were taken along the centerline of the transverse sections of all four swords in order to more fully characterize them. A large variation in hardness was found and is presented in Table II. The hardness correlated with the matrix microstructure. The matrix structure of the blades underwent a transition from pearlite at the thin tip to a divorced eutectoid ferrite + cementite at the fat end (thickness = 3-4 mm).

Juha Perttula has reproduced a wootz Damascus steel and measured the Charpy Impact toughness and hardness. Juha Perttula. (2004) Wootz Damascus steel of ancient orient. Scandinavian Journal of Metallurgy 33:2, 92-97. It is reported that superior toughness can be achieved with a uniform distribution of carbides, and that dendritic segregation of chromium additions lead to the banded structure and are important to avoid graphitisation. Mechanical properties are reported for both pearlite and tempered martensite microstructures. Pearlite microstructures had a Charpy impact toughness between 30-120 and hardness Rc=23. Tempered martensite had impact toughness 10-50 and Rc from 39-63.

[Sherby 1995]
O. D. Sherby, Damascus steel and superplasticity, Part I- Background, Superplasticity and
genuine Damascus steels, Part II-Welded Damascus steels. SAMPE Journal, 31, 4 (1995).

[Hadfield 1912]
R. Hadfield, Sinhalese iron and steel of ancient origin, Journal of the Iron and Steel Institute, 85 (1912).

Advertisements

4 Responses

  1. The damascus knives made today, or sold today, are they made using the same steps as the original Damascus swords? Are the ones today still as incredibly strong as the ancient ones?

  2. They’re probably stronger, but not many people are amazed anymore 🙂

  3. Think about it: Nanotubes are DIAMONDOID. Diamondoid, aka, diamonds. Nanodiamond edged blades would be sharper harder tougher and stronger and NOT brittle. Aka, shatterproof. Even a fraction of that power added to a sword would make it super.

  4. The swords and knives may today which have a Damascus pattern are often made by welding. The pattern is made for aesthetics only. I think initially the pattern was an indicator of good process control, today superior properties can probably be obtained from a high strength steel without the Damascus pattern. Although producing the pattern does still indicate a level of skill from the manufacturer.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: